Check Out Our Advertisers!
     None  Accounting/Bookkeeping
     None  Advertising
     None  Alterations
     None  Attorney - Lawyer
     None  Auto
     None  Automotive Dealerships
     None  Aviation
     None  Banks and Credit Unions
     None  Barns and Steel Buildings
     None  Blacksmith
     None  Carpet Cleaning
     None  Catering
     None  Chamber of Commerce
     None  Child Care
     None  Chiropractic Care
     None  Churches
     None  Computer Services
     None  Dentist
     None  Dry Cleaning
     None  Dryer Vent Cleaning & Repair
     None  Drywall
     None  Electric utility
     None  Electrician
     None  Equine Services
     None  Excavating
     None  Eye Care
     None  Feed Stores
     None  Field Mowing
     None  Financial Services
     None  Firearms
     None  Fireplace Sales/Service
     None  Firewood
     None  Fitness
     None  Flooring
     None  Florist
     None  Funeral Home
     None  Garage Doors
     None  Golf Courses
     None  Hair/Nail Care and Cosmetics
     None  Health Care Facilities and Services
     None  Health Care
     None  Heating and Cooling
     None  Home Inspector
     None  Home Maintenance
     None  House Cleaning
     None  Insurance
     None  Internet Service
     None  Jewelry
     None  Landscaping
     None  Mortgage
     None  Movers
     None  Music Lessons
     None  Paving/Asphalt
     None  Pet Grooming
     None  Pet Sitter
     None  Pet Store
     None  Pet Training
     None  Photography
     None  Plumbing
     None  Portable Buildings
     None  Propane Delivery
     None  Propane
     None  Real Estate Services
     None  Restaurants
     None  Roofing
     None  Schools
     None  Senior Citizens Services
     None  Sewing - lessons, supplies
     None  Sheds, Outbuildings
     None  Shipping Services
     None  Small Engine Repair
     None  Specialty/Gifts
     None  Storage
     None  Tax Preparation
     None  Tires
     None  Tractor, Trailer and RV Sales
     None  Veterinarian
     None  Window Replacement
     None  Windshield Repair

“Mothers give us life, love, and the heartfelt inclination to cry, 'I want my mommy,' no matter how old we get.”
– Richelle E. Goodrick  
About | Contact | Advertise | News Stands | Subscribe | Privacy Policy 

  Volume No. 10 Issue No. 5 May 2014  

None Adopt Me   None Black Forest News   None Book Review   None Business Briefs  
None Community Calendar   None D 49 Sports   None FFPD News   None Face to Face  
None From the Publisher   None Health and Wellness   None Letters to the Editor   None Monkey Business  
None News Briefs   None News from D 49   None Pet Care   None Photo Stories  
None Phun Photos   None Rumors  
Front Page   |   Feature Stories   |   Search This Issue   |   Log In
Feature Stories
Printer Friendly Version
  Community Rights Amendment headed for ballot
  Targets fracking but could be used to control any business
  By Jason Gray

   The Colorado Community Rights Network is taking on what it sees as the dangers of fracking and other large corporate activities in the state. The Community Rights Amendment, which the group hopes to have on the November ballot, would give city and county governments powers far beyond existing land use and zoning regulations.
   “That's one of the main differences between our initiative and the others,” said Lotus, chairman of Colorado Springs Citizens for Community Rights. (Lotus is known by a single name.) “It doesn't matter if it's a company that's going to frack no matter what the community wants, regardless of the community's rights to be healthy. It also applies to other corporate activities like corporate pig farming, cyanide mining and GMO agriculture where they're contaminating farmers’ crops in nearby fields.”
   The ballot initiative is currently being challenged in the Colorado Supreme Court. The issue being heard is whether the initiative meets the single subject rule, which states that a question on a ballot must address only one subject that expresses a clear intent. “That's our last obstacle before we can reasonably begin collecting signatures,” Lotus said. “The opponents argue that the initiative is not single-subject; that it's not clear and doesn't represent our intent. We think we will win pretty easily.” If the Supreme Court rules in favor of the CRA, supporters must still collect enough signatures to qualify for the Nov. 4 ballot.
   The amendment would give cities and towns in Colorado “the power to enact local laws establishing, defining, altering, or eliminating the rights, powers, and duties of corporations and other business entities operating or seeking to operate in the community, to prevent such rights and powers from interfering with such locally enacted fundamental rights of individuals, their communities, and nature,” according to the amendment text at
   Industry and corporate interests are expected to oppose the measure vigorously, Lotus said. “The fact they have a tremendous amount of money to put in PR like the tobacco companies in the past doesn't matter because we have truth and justice on our side,” Lotus said.
   The Colorado Springs Regional Business Alliance has not taken a position on the amendment because it's too early in the process, said Brittany Harp, communications manager. “The ballot hasn't been created yet, and we have a process for legislative initiatives review,” Harp said.
   The amendment's language that local laws enacted under the amendment would “not be subject to pre-emption by international, federal or state laws” opens up a can of worms. “Two words: supremacy clause,” said Jordan Sickman, a Chicago property rights attorney. The supremacy clause in the U.S. Constitution establishes the constitution, federal statutes and treaties as “the supreme law of the land.” Local laws enacted under the CRA would face similar conflict with federal law as Colorado's legalization of marijuana, in which cannabis is still illegal under federal law but legal under Colorado law.
   “There's some validity to the supremacy clause issue,” Lotus said. “They'll likely still have trouble at the federal and international level. That's why we can't stop at only the state level.”
   Amendment proponents describe the conflict between private property rights of corporations and the rights of communities to control what occurs in their boundaries as similar to the civil rights movement of the 1960s. “We're in for the long haul, similar to women’s voting rights and the civil rights movement,” Lotus said. “There's a very strong need for this that goes back to the writing of the bill of rights. The king was nullifying local laws, and now we're back in the same situation; where the state and federal governments think they have the right to nullify local activities.”
   Despite the anti-corporate nature of the text and campaign, the CRN hopes to make the initiative a non-partisan issue. “When it comes to basic human rights to things like health, clear water, clean air, protection of property values – this isn't Democratic or Libertarian or Green Party issues,” Lotus said. “These are rights that we're all ready to fight for.”
   The Colorado Supreme Court is expected to rule on whether the initiative can move on to collecting signatures in May.


© 2004-2017 The New Falcon Herald.
All rights reserved.